Our website is made possible by displaying non-intrusive online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling or pausing your ad blocker.
SD cannot just be the party on the receiving end and left to the wimps and fancy of KPMG hiding behind 'professionalism'. SD has every right to prove their case through legal means. If KPMG is to be proven at fault, they cannot continue to hide behind while investors and SD loss millions
Why PN17? EY has been appointed. Whether KPMG consented to the condition of acceptance of EY is beyond SD's control. If KPMG insists, SC or Bursa should ban KPMG instead of reprimand SD
If false accounts, how could Serba sue KPMG? It seems that KPMG's professionalism is in question too as they were in incommunicado, according to Serba in the PC. how can you just ignore your auditee after your raise redflag to authorities? What choice do Serba has to close the audit in time or to see through the issue together to find a solution?
