Our website is made possible by displaying non-intrusive online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling or pausing your ad blocker.
K S 不能这么看吧
我们来假设政府决定向TG收windfall tax,TG的收入会怎么样?
两种情况,第一是TG自己吸收掉这笔多出来的tax,那么profit margin应该会降低,PAT减少,EPS也会比预期低一些
第二种情况则是把这笔tax转移到手套卖价,结果就是卖价提升,市场竞争力变弱,导致销量下滑,profit减少,EPS一样会比预期低一些
It is too idealistic that you thought ALL medicines in Msia are from two companies, they are not huge enough to close the demand gap. Even if they did, the gov of Msia should never do that too, as this is a kind of MONOPOLY, which definitely is not advantageous to us Malaysians.
I won’t deny what you found — the common medicines at home are from these two companies, but we shouldn’t assume the whole by observing just a small piece in the particular sector, right?
After all, the link that I provided is published by the government of Malaysia. Unless they lied to us, it should be a strong evidence.
Anwar Naushad Are you sure that Malaysia never used drugs from China?
Here’s what I found, China is, or at least used to be, one of the major import destination of pharmaceutical products. In 2016 RM 822 mil pharmaceutical products were imported from China, which including provitamins, vaccines, medicament mixtures and etc. (Ref: MITI, Malaysia, https://www.miti.gov.my/miti/resources/13._Pharmaceutical_Industry_.pdf )
I really wondered if the Malaysia that you know and that I know is the same?
“Always based on fact”...? LOL.
ahpooki tai I wonder where did you get the data 75%? You look so confident
I bought both warrants and mother shares, the earning from warrants is more than from mother share so far. Simply because of the gearing effect. As long as people know the risk of buying warrant, it’s people’s choice to buy warrant or mother share. After all they didn’t use a cent of yours, right?